Mohor Fajdiga

Mohor Fajdiga je raziskovalec in asistent na katedri za ustavno pravo. Po 15-mesečnem sodniškem pripravništvu na Višjem sodišču v Ljubljani se je leta 2020 zaposlil na Pravni fakulteti. V letu 2021 je opravil pravniški državni izpit. Raziskovalno se ukvarja s zastraševalnim učinkom (ang. chilling effect) in svobodo izražanja sodnikov ter s sodniško neodvisnostjo in izbirnimi postopki za sodnike. Sodeluje pri dveh raziskovalnih projektih s področja sodstva.

FAJDIGA, M. (forthcoming): Chilling Effect or no Chilling Effect: To Be or Not to Be for Freedom of Expression of Judges before the European Court of Human Rights, in CASAROSA, F., FAJDIGA, M., MORARU, M. (eds.), Freedom of Expression of Judges: European and National Perspectives, Routledge.

FAJDIGA, M. (2024): Chilling effect: Turning the poison into an antidote for fundamental rights in Europe, in: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X241239019

FAJDIGA, M., ZAGORC, S. (2023): Freedom or feardom of expression of judges? : exploring the "chilling effect" on judicial speech, in: European constitutional law review 19 (2023) 2 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019623000093  

FAJDIGA, M. (2021): Izbira Sodnega sveta : ignorantia rationis nocet? v: Zbornik znanstvenih razprav 81 (2021) 1, 63-83. https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=140826 

Fajdiga, M., Kos, U. A., Oprčkal (et al.) (2021): Heightened scrutiny of colonial consent according to the Chagos Advisory Opinion: Pandora's box reopened?, in: BURRI, T., TRINIDAD, J., HOFSTETTER, D. (eds.), The International Court of Justice and decolonisation : new directions from the Chagos Advisory Opinion. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108893770.011 

ZAGORC, S., FAJDIGA, M. (2018): The principle of consistent interpretation in Slovenia : inconsistently consistent or consistently inconsistent?, in: Franklin, C. N. K. (ed.), The effectiveness and application of EU and EEA law in national courts : principles of consistent interpretation. Cambridge, Antwerp, Chicago: Intersentia, 411–449.

JUDGMERIT: Izbira sodnikov pod drobnogledom: sodniška neodvisnost, zakonitost in odlike / Judicial Selection under Scrutiny: Judicial Independence, lawfulness and Merit, Raziskovalni projekt ARIS / ARIS Research project (J5-4583). http://www.judgmerit.si/   

TRIIAL 2: TRust, Independence, Impartiality and Accountability of Legal professionals under the EU Charter - part 2, funded by the European Commission (Project no. 101089737). https://cjc.eui.eu/projects/triial-2/